Several months after the OPMA, AGM of October 2018, I wrote the following to the executive of the OPMA. I have also attached the response I got. I have not heard from anybody since
Good morning Jim
Hopefully you are having a wonderful and relaxing Easter weekend with your family.
Two recent things have pushed me to connect with you.
Firstly, not that long ago, I received communication from your office that there had been a meeting with the Ministry of Health along with members of the OSC and their representative from the Daisy group. The fact that we are allowing their lobbyist (and look at who this is) to be in on meetings with the OPMA and our not having any such representation is bothersome to me.
Secondly, this past week we received word that other healthcare professionals are receiving the rights to order certain tests and perform certain acts that are expanding their scopes of practice. Unless I am not fully informed, it appears that we are again being left out.
These two events listed above would indicate to me that the Don Gravy train has again failed us.
This goes to the heart of what I expressed at the fall AGM and I continue to be mystified as to why we are persisting down this road to failure.
I look forward to your reply
Fraternally
David
--
David Greenberg BA,DPM, FAAFAS
James: Thanks for your input. The item is on the agenda for our next Board meeting. I will let you know what transpires asap.
I did however receive, as we all have, a members update as of January 31, 2020.
My question to the membership is:
Does anybody feel optimistic or content with the contents as expressed in that correspondence?
I certainly am not.
Again we are talking about proposed drug regulations and a few other items that we've been talking about for some time.
The most important item relates to the conversion to a podiatry model. Is this not a rehash of the same stories that we have been told for many many years?
One difference however is that we are working very closely with chiropodists to evolve podiatry as we know it to a super chiropody model.
I take no solace in the fact that other people are also struggling to advance their cause.
We have and have always had a very unique type of service which includes all levels of medicine including osseous surgery. No other group can make that claim.
Certain facts remain.
Podiatric medicine which includes osseous surgery is dying.
Along with that dies the requirement to have the highest level of podiatric medical training in order to practice in Ontario
In spite of this failure to achieve our goals, the OPMA is proceeding along the same failed path that has taken us to this point.
I agree with others who have lamented that the OPMA has now become redundant and ineffective.
I would urge others to voice their concerns if they are in fact bothered by where we are at this point
As I edge to retirement, I am slowly evolving my practice to a chiropody model even though I am bringing in a Quebec trained podiatrist to work in my office. I am lucky in Ottawa in that I can send my surgical patients to Quebec to have osseous surgery by skilled podiatric surgeons.
Since I’ve already paid my OPMA dues for this year, I am still considered a member. But I can’t see any reason why future funds should be given to an association that continues to under perform- with no likely chance of success, by following the same ineffective actions